Author: Onit

4 Enterprise Legal Management (ELM) Code Phrases to Fear

Our previous two posts discussed – Enterprise Legal Management Needs to Grow Up and The Beginning of the ELM SaaS Revolution. This will address some of the ways traditional ELM vendors may try to shift the blame for problems introduced by overcomplicated, underpowered solutions to the customer.

If you hear the following four phrases when evaluating an ELM offering, consider the following translations before you make your decision:

“Senior management has to champion the idea.”

Translation: People won’t use this unless they are forced.

This is something you’ll hear if user experience (UX) isn’t considered an integral part of the design process. Onit ELM solutions are designed to be configured to existing workflows, making adaptability and user adoption simple.

“Change Management is essential for success.”

Translation: The benefit to your business and legal users is illusory.

If a solution claims to offer a significant benefit, that benefit shouldn’t be negated by the amount of effort required to enforce compliance with a new process. Change management is entirely unnecessary when a solution is designed with the user and workflow in mind.

“A strong training program is critical to adoption.”

Translation: This software is incredibly hard to use.

It’s 2016. The vast majority of us have daily interactions with multiple pieces of software. We know our way around a computer. If we still need to attend multiple training sessions to learn how to operate a user interface, that is not a failure on our end. It is a failure in design.

Business software should work and be designed with the same expectations of usability as consumer software.

“We release new versions once or twice a year.”

Translation: Prepare to spend a lot of time and money staying current.

With already lengthy implementation times, frequent version updates can make keeping an application current a full time job. You shouldn’t pay someone a salary to maintain minor changes and oversee the addition of features you never asked for and don’t need.

Case Study: Transforming the Way Legal Works

Now, let’s look at what you can expect from a standard Onit solution implementation.

Onit partnered with a large Fortune 500 client to deploy an NDA App. The company’s in-house legal department processed upwards of 10,000 NDAs annually, with an average turnaround time of 16 days.

Onit developed and deployed a prototype solution within a month to handle global submission, negotiation, and electronic signature of NDAs that supported the existing demand.

The company processed over one thousand NDAs within the first month of deployment, with the completion time reduced to just 24 hours (that’s a 95% reduction from the previous average.) 90% of the NDAs were processed without lawyer involvement.

Modern ELM solutions from Onit are cheaper, quicker to deploy, and more responsive to your actual business needs.

Learn more about what Onit brings to Enterprise Legal Management in our free white paper“ A New Approach to Enterprise Legal Management.”

The New Technology Curve

Preparing Enterprise Legal Management (ELM) for the SaaS model

Over the last two decades, the software industry has rapidly evolved. Vendors across all industries have come to see the benefit of the Software as a Service (Saas) model, drastically changing the way individuals and companies interact with software.

A high level of end user support has become integral to almost every serious enterprise software solution, and user interfaces and UX design have received the serious attention they deserved. People have become accustomed to certain design philosophies that support usability and efficiency.

The same can’t be said for the majority of enterprise legal management vendors, though. Regardless, it is inevitable that the database-centric philosophy of ELM will be supplanted by intuitive, user-centric solutions that have already become the norm in many other business areas.

Indicators of the Future

Cloud-based solutions are coming to increasing dominate various marketplaces, but SaaS means more than the just taking an existing enterprise App and porting it to a cloud-based platform. Salesforce has revolutionized the CRM by thinking about CRM in a far different way than Siebel systems and others did. Companies such as Box and Dropbox provide convenient storage and sharing capabilities, making collaboration within organizations easier than ever believed possible. Amazon’s cloud web service provides on-demand content distribution with incredible scalability at a price point that was completely impossible a few decades ago.

And how did these companies do this? One common theme is that they abandoned the concept that the server, data, or document lies at the center of the process. They replaced them with the user.

Challengers Appear

In the ELM space, the challenge to the database-centric status quo comes in the form of enterprise solutions that, instead of boasting long feature lists and long implementation times, are simple to configure, easy to deploy, and address complex everyday problems.

Where the old market wants to “serve the data,” these new solutions learn from other new success stories in the enterprise software market and instead strive to make it easier for lawyers and other law department to successfully support business staff and get their work done.

Functionality, adaptability and adoptability supplant endless lists of out-of-touch features. Simple accessibility is made obsolete by tools that allow users to collaborate simply, easily and as part of their normal work streams.

Enterprise Apps can be built to serve both large and small companies, while the older ELM solutions are simply too complex and costly for law departments of all sizes — large and small. For this same reason, deployments can also be executed very quickly — typically in weeks (instead of up to or more than a year as is required of many traditional ELM systems).

A Different Architectural Philosophy

The biggest differences between traditional ELM systems reflect greater generational changes in how the discipline has evolved, as explored in the previous post. Some nice side effects of that are compatibility, labor savings, customizability, and quick deployment.

Compatibility

Many modern ELM solutions (such as those from Onit) are designed to be able to work alongside and together with systems that are already in place, allowing legal departments to both supplement the capabilities of what they have or to ease their transition to a more modern system.

Minimal IT Involvement

While traditional ELM systems require constant IT maintenance and attention, modern ELM solutions are lean and nimble and tend to work in a more straightforward manner. In many cases, users can configure, deploy, and support Onit solutions with no corporate IT involvement. This is because they are designed and built in an intuitive, “no code” environment that can be learned without even the need for a training session.

A Solution for Every Workflow

Solutions for standard processes like contract review and approval, NDAs, alternative fee arrangements, and matter or legal spend management are offered prebuilt. For more esoteric needs particular to a business, solutions can be created from scratch with minimal delay in deployment.

Drive Operational Improvements Easily

Unlike the development and implementation process for a large enterprise legal management system, which can take several months or years, the average time it takes to implement an Onit solution is less than 20 days. While the most complex implementations can take up to 90 days, this still beats the average for ELM systems by months.

Learn more about what Onit brings to Enterprise Legal Management in our free white paper “A New Approach to Enterprise Legal Management.”

Enterprise Legal Management Needs to Grow Up

To justify the bold assertion of this article’s subtitle, it is first necessary to understand how today’s traditional enterprise legal management (ELM) systems were born.

The ELM market as it exists today can be traced back to 1978, when Equitable Life’s law department saw the potential for their new WANG VS word processing system to do more. It could be used to manage the details of each legal matter, details regarding outside counsel, and many other things that Equitable Life needed to monitor about their day-to-day legal operations.

Matter Management

Partnering with CompInfo, Equitable developed a matter management system that ultimately became a product called Corporate LawPack. Over the next two decades, Corporate LawPack was ported to a variety of hardware and software platforms, leading to its eventual adoption by the legal departments of many Fortune 100 companies, as well as within many governmental and financial institutions.

The 1980s through the mid-1990s saw the broad adoption of matter management software, designed to facilitate the administration of corporate legal practices. These solutions, while providing a robust matter database, did not affect lawyers or law department efficiency. Primarily, they served as reporting tools.

These databases required a tremendous amount of data to be manually entered if it was expected to drive any meaningful value. For this reason, these systems were not widely used by lawyers themselves and instead relied heavily on support staff to operate.

Spend Management

In the mid-1990s to the early years of the 2000s, matter management’s twin sister, legal spend management, made its entrance — driven, in great part, by DuPont’s implementation of the DuPont Legal Model in 1992. DuPont helped embed the notion that focusing on partnering with outside counsel and managing the rich data provided on legal invoices would lead to significant operational efficiencies and reduced legal spend. This led to the Uniform Task Based Management System (UTBMS) initiative and spawned the new class of spend management software.

Legal spend management systems gave clients visibility into the details of what law firms were billing and it became the primary means of exercising more control over how matters were managed by outside counsel. This transparency initiated a shift in the way legal business is conducted that continues today, with clients having more power to require alternative fee arrangements, enforce billing guidelines, affect cost reduction.

The Beginning of the End

The inevitable followed: spend and matter management provided by different vendors required costly and complex integrations. Customers found themselves managing one vendor relationship for matter management and another for spend management. Ultimately, a number of spend management vendors were acquired by matter management vendors or vice-versa, along with the development of spend management capabilities being built into existing matter management systems.

In either case, the new integrated matter and spend management systems created even more complexity and even steeper learning curves. So much time figuring out how to build an integrated matter and spend management platform was invested during this period that innovation — particularly around the user experience and actual legal department work process — essentially stalled.

When coupled with migrating their platforms from multiple operating systems, databases and supporting the introduction of cloud-based or Software as a Service (SaaS) platforms and other more agile technologies, vendors now find themselves struggling under the weight of their legacy technologies with little focus on real innovation in supporting the broader notion of legal operations and process management. Customers wrestle with software built upon a decades old concept that ELM is essentially a database problem.

But what if that is only half of the equation?

According to Gartner, that’s exactly the case: ELM is no longer just about matter and spend management. In addition to the responsibility of managing documents, e-billing, matters and outside counsel, it’s equally important for corporate legal departments to be involved in business processes themselves.

Gartner states: “In an enterprise legal management context, BPM [business process management] includes the automation of manual processes through methods such as workflow and collaboration functionality. Examples of these include the distribution and approval of legal documents, assignment of tasks and legal resources, as well as the monitoring of alternative fee agreements.”

These are roles that existing ELM vendors were neither built nor prepared for.

Learn more about the modern solutions to ELM stagnation in our next blog post (hint: it’s SaaS)! Or get the full story now from our free white paper.

How Can I Be Sure My Data Is Safe with Legal E-Billing Software?

Even many otherwise highly sophisticated CFOs and financial departments have difficulty estimating expenses and doing fundamental accounting and bookkeeping, they need to control costs and keep outside counsel appropriately reined in.

You know it is time for a change to bring your legal billing process up to date. But you face a problem. Over the past several years, many legal e-billing software and billing apps have sprouted up. While you see the value of this kind of software, in the abstract, you are probably overwhelmed by all the choices and concerned about security and safety.

You’re not being paranoid. There are excellent reasons to be concerned. First of all, untested software (or at least software untested for the kinds of billing needs you need to get done) is out there and can expose you and your team to problems.

You want to maintain control of the billing process and avoid exposure to liability risks (for instance, what if billing data somehow got leaked?). Likewise, you want software without superfluous features that could complicate what you are trying to do.

LEGAL E-BILLING: HOW TO TELL IF YOUR BILLING SOFTWARE IS SECURE ENOUGH

Here are some tips for ensuring your data is safe with the legal e-billing application you select.

  • Choose a provider that takes information security seriously. BusyLamp is ISO 27001 certified, meaning we have a framework with specific policies and procedures around data risk identification, implications, and control.
  • Choose software with an excellent track record. BusyLamp works with many financial institutions, banks, and law firms. Our software helps them comply with complicated regulatory requirements, and we successfully work with institutions with significant data and privacy concerns. We use sophisticated encryption techniques as well as password-protected access to safeguard data.
  • Before purchasing billing software and installing it, ask good questions. For instance, how can you protect data and billing information from being vulnerable to unauthorized access, manipulation, or destruction due to a fire or accident?
  • Be watchful and systematize data review and backup. Even if the best hacking minds could not crack your systems, you still want to assess your billing statements and processes regularly to identify anomalies or red flags that could indicate problems.
  • Avoid using untested legal e-billing solutions. BusyLamp’s scalable software as a service model has allowed us to provide diverse e-billing and fee-tracking tools. Our product is unique in the world of legal expense management.
  • Respond immediately if you identify a security issue. A data breach or loss of important information is containable if caught quickly enough. By tracking your billing processes precisely and accurately, you will be able to respond faster if a problem occurs.
  • Remember: Encryption is key. To our knowledge, BusyLamp is the only provider that encrypts stored data and not only the end-to-end communication.

Read and bookmark our checklist for more data security considerations.

We would love to understand more about your e-billing concerns and help you find the right solution for your team and budget. Contact us today.

SIND MEINE DATEN IN DER EBILLING SOFTWARE SICHER? 

Selbst viele erfahrene CFOs und hochentwickelte Finanzabteilungen tun sich schwer damit, Ausgaben angemessen zu prognostizieren und somit die erforderlichen Schritte in Buchhaltung und Rechnungswesen zu betreiben. 

Wahrscheinlich geht es Ihnen ähnlich – Sie wissen, dass es an der Zeit für Veränderung ist, sind jedoch vom Angebot überwältigt und fragen sich, wer Ihnen die maximale Datensicherheit bieten kann? Sie sind bereits überzeugt von dem Mehrwert, den Ihnen juristische eBilling Software bieten kann und benötigen nun Unterstützung dabei, Ihre Legal Operations Prozesse zu digitalisieren? 

Es gibt gute Gründe, auf die Sicherheit Ihrer Daten zu achten. So kann es zum Beispiel durchaus vorkommen, dass einige Anbieter ihre Software nicht vorab auf kundenspezifische Anforderungen testen, was Sie und Ihr Team bei der Implementierung dieser Software vor große Herausforderungen stellt. Gleichzeitig birgt gewisse Software die Gefahr, durch unpassende Prozesse und Funktionen Ihre tägliche Arbeit sogar zu erschweren oder stellt Sie – im äußersten Fall – sogar beim etwaigen Durchdringen wichtiger Rechnungsinformationen vor elementare Haftungsfragen. 

Im Folgenden finden Sie sieben Kriterien, mit denen Sie dafür Sorgen können, dass Ihre Daten in der ausgewählten Anwendung sicher sind: 

  1. Anbieterauswahl: Wählen Sie einen Anbieter, der das Thema Informationssicherheit ernst nimmt. Unsere Legal Spend Management-Lösung BusyLamp eBilling.Space ist ISO 27001-zertifiziert, was bedeutet, dass wir über spezifische Richtlinien und Verfahren zum Identifizieren und Kontrollieren von Datenrisiken verfügen. 
  2. Softwareauswahl: Entscheiden Sie sich für eine Software mit einer repräsentativen Erfolgsbilanz. Wir arbeiten mit vielen Finanzinstituten, Banken und Anwaltskanzleien zusammen und weisen daher die notwendige Expertise hinsichtlich komplizierter regulatorischer Anforderungen auf. Wir verwenden daher ausgefeilte Verschlüsselungstechniken sowie anspruchsvolle Passwortkriterien, um Ihre sensiblen Daten bestmöglich zu schützen. 
  3. Fragenkatalog: Bevor Sie eine eBilling-Software wählen, sollten Sie sich relevante Fragen genau formulieren. Wie können Sie zum Beispiel Ihre Daten und Abrechnungsinformationen davor schützen, dass sie durch unbefugten Zugriff, Manipulation oder gar Zerstörung (etwa durch einen Brand oder Unfall) gefährdet sind? 
  4. Wachsamkeit: Seien Sie wachsam und systematisieren Sie das Überprüfen und Sichern von Daten. Selbst wenn die besten Hacker Ihre Systeme nicht knacken können, sollten Sie dennoch Anomalien oder Schwachstellen identifizieren, um Probleme zu vermeiden. 
  5. Professionalität: Vermeiden Sie die Verwendung von ungetesteten eBilling-Lösungen. Unser skalierbares SaaS-Modell ermöglicht es uns, verschiedene Module rund um Ihre Legal Operations anzubieten. Unsere Produkte sind professionell und einzigartig. 
  6. Geschwindigkeit: Reagieren Sie sofort, wenn Sie ein Sicherheitsproblem erkennen. Schnell genug erkannt, kann eine Datenpanne oder der Verlust von wichtigen Informationen eingedämmt werden. Indem Sie Ihre Abrechnungsprozesse präzise und genau verfolgen, können Sie schneller reagieren, falls ein Problem auftritt. 
  7. Verschlüsselung BusyLamp ist Vorreiter in Sachen End-to-End-Kommunikationsverschlüsselung. 

Lesen und bookmarken Sie unsere Checkliste für weitere Überlegungen zur Datensicherheit

Wir würden gerne mehr über Ihre Bedenken bezüglich Legal eBilling erfahren und Ihnen helfen, eine Lösung zu finden, die für Ihr Team und Budget geeignet ist. Treten Sie mit uns in Kontakt.  

Aus dem englischen Originalblog übersetzt. 

Looking Inward to Control Outside Legal Counsel Costs

Hiring outside counsel to handle urgent, time-sensitive work (or even ongoing, non-sensitive projects) can be heartburn-inducing, particularly if you must keep your team’s financials in line and reduce costs. Here are five battle-tested tips for ensuring that the money you spend on outside counsel gets spent wisely and that you get an appropriate return on any investment.

1. SET GUIDELINES FOR THE SPEND AND ENFORCE THEM.

Be specific and detailed when you create guidelines. Download “Getting Started with Billing Guidelines” for examples. Conduct record keeping, invoicing, and tracking attorney time and expenses according to strict formulas. This “by the book” approach may seem bureaucratic and even lead to accusations of micromanaging. But budget processes left unmanaged tend to evolve for the convenience of those involved rather than for the greater good of the company or customer. When everyone involved internally and externally understands billing expectations, there will be fewer surprises and less room for overinflated numbers.

2. EXAMINE PAST SPENDING AND BILLING HABITS AND LEARN YOUR LESSONS.

What’s gone wrong when you’ve worked with outside counsel? Examine metrics related to your relationship and conduct interviews with your team to gauge your process’s strengths and weaknesses. Map out how you spend money now (your “as is” budget), and then identify where you want to go. Don’t just harp on the problems; pay attention to what is working well, so you can do more of that.

3. MONITOR TO ENSURE QUALITY CONTROL.

After establishing a billing policy, defining how much you want to spend and for what, measuring your deliverables, and determining how to handle noncompliance, you still have work to do! Next, you must follow up on your process and identify slack and unnecessary constraints. When analyzing, look for duplicated steps, task waste, redundant research done on projects, poor communication, and billing at abnormally high rates for administrative tasks, like proofreading or document filing.

4. IDENTIFY BENCHMARKS TO MEASURE OUTSIDE COUNSEL’S OUTPUT.

For instance, if one firm is billing you at 1.5 times the rate you pay other outside counsel, you want to understand why. Why are you paying this extra amount? Is the spend worth it or not? By benchmarking across your relationships with various firms, you can clarify best practices and enforce expectations.

5. WHEN NEGOTIATING WITH OUTSIDE COUNSEL, FIRST LOOK INWARD TO DEVELOP THE BEST ALTERNATIVE TO NEGOTIATED ARRANGEMENT (OR BATNA).

Maybe outside counsel has been delivering good work but charging a relatively high rate. Before you dive into negotiations, determine in advance what you will accept in terms of a rate and your best alternative if you cannot get that rate. For instance, you might end the relationship, seek new partners, terminate the contract in question, and still do other business.

To control outside counsel costs and manage your business more efficiently and effectively, leverage Onit’s European legal management solution BusyLamp.space unique software. Explore our website for more details or call or email our team with any questions.

Request a demo of BusyLamp eBilling.space.

VERHANDLUNGEN MIT EXTERNEN BERATERN – 5 BEWÄHRTE TIPPS ZUR OPTIMIERUNG IHRER LEGAL SPEND INVESTITIONEN

Die Beauftragung eines externen Rechtsbeistands mit dringenden, zeitkritischen Aufgaben (oder sogar laufenden, nicht sensiblen Projekten) kann verunsichernd sein – vor allem, wenn Sie die Finanzen Ihres Teams monitoren und die Ausgaben geringhalten müssen. Im Folgenden finden Sie daher fünf praxiserprobte Tipps, wie Sie sicherstellen können, dass Sie Ihren externen Legal Spend sinnvoll einsetzen und eine angemessene Rendite für jede Investition erhalten. 

1. FESTLEGEN UND DURCHSETZEN VON BILLING GUIDELINES 

Erstelle Sie spezifische und detaillierte Abrechnungsrichtlinien. Als Orientierung hilft unser Guide „Getting started with Billing Guidelines“. Dieser Ansatz mag bürokratisch erscheinen und sogar zu dem Vorwurf des Mikromanagements führen. Aber Budgetprozesse, die nicht gemanagt werden, neigen dazu, sich für die Bequemlichkeit der Beteiligten zu entwickeln und nicht für das größere Wohl des Unternehmens oder des Kunden. Wenn alle Beteiligten intern und extern wissen, was bei der Rechnungsstellung erwartet wird, gibt es weniger Überraschungen und weniger Raum für überhöhte Zahlen. 

2. PRÜFEN SIE VERGANGENE AUSGABEN- UND ABRECHNUNGSGEWOHNHEITEN UND LERNEN SIE DARAUS 

Was ist bei der Zusammenarbeit mit externen Anwälten in der Vergangenheit schiefgelaufen? Untersuchen Sie die verschiedenen Metriken und führen Sie Interviews mit Ihrem Team durch, um die Stärken und Schwächen Ihres Prozesses zu ermitteln. Betrachten Sie zunächst Ihr Ist-Budget und legen Sie dann fest, wo Sie hinwollen. Achten Sie nicht nur auf die Probleme, sondern auch darauf, was derzeit gut funktioniert, damit Sie mehr davon machen können. 

3. STÄNDIGES MONITOREN ZUR QUALITÄTSSICHERUNG 

Nachdem Sie Billing Guidelines definiert haben und festgelegt haben, wie viel Sie wofür ausgeben wollen, Ihre Leistungen gemessen und festgelegt haben, wie mit Nichteinhaltung umgegangen werden soll, haben Sie noch viel zu tun. Als Nächstes gilt es den Prozess weiterzuverfolgen und etwaigen Leerlauf oder unnötige Einschränkungen zu ermitteln. Achten Sie bei der Analyse auf doppelte Arbeitsschritte, Verschwendung von Aufgaben, überflüssige Recherchen im Rahmen von Projekten, mangelhafte Kommunikation und ungewöhnlich hohe Abrechnungssätze für Verwaltungsaufgaben wie Korrekturlesen oder Ablegen von Dokumenten. 

4. ERMITTELN SIE BENCHMARKS, UM DIE LEISTUNG DER EXTERNEN ANWÄLTE ZU MESSEN 

Wenn eine Kanzlei Ihnen beispielsweise das 1,5-fache dessen in Rechnung stellt, was Sie anderen externen Anwälten zahlen, sollten Sie den Grund dafür herausfinden. Warum zahlen Sie diesen zusätzlichen Betrag? Lohnen sich die Ausgaben oder nicht? Durch ein Benchmarking Ihrer Beziehungen zu verschiedenen Kanzleien können Sie die besten Praktiken identifizieren und Ihre Erwartungen durchsetzen. 

5. PRÜFEN SIE INTERNE ALTERNATIVEN VOR DEN VERHANDLUNGEN MIT EXTERNEN BERATERN  

Vielleicht hat der externe Berater gute Arbeit geleistet, aber auch einen relativ hohen Preis für seine Arbeit verlangt. Bevor Sie sich auf Verhandlungen einlassen, sollten Sie zuerst festlegen, welchen Satz Sie akzeptieren würden und was Ihre beste Alternative wäre, wenn Sie diesen Satz nicht erreichen können. Sie könnten zum Beispiel die Geschäftsbeziehung beenden und sich einen neuen Partner suchen, oder Sie könnten den betreffenden Vertrag kündigen und dennoch andere Geschäfte abschließen. 

Nutzen Sie Onit‘s Legal Spend Management Software BusyLamp eBilling.Space, um die Kosten für externe Anwälte zu tracken und Ihr Unternehmen effizienter und effektiver zu verwalten. 

Aus dem englischen Original-Blog übersetzt. 

Outside Counsel Management 101: How Often Should You Review the Performance of Your Outside Counsel?

Whether you task outside counsel with predictable ongoing requirements or you and your team send work out ad hoc, you need metrics to track performance and processes to keep your budget in line and deliverables appropriate.

Developing a systematic approach to performance review can eliminate some financial uncertainty, assist your project managers, and identify key performance indicators (KPIs) to measure efficacy. Good reviews can help you purge, if necessary, or overhaul the process you use with counsel to make it work better and more efficiently.

OUTSIDE COUNSEL MANAGEMENT: THE SECRETS TO GREAT REVIEWS

There is no hard and fast rule regarding your review’s ideal timing or depth. These elements will depend on diverse factors, such as:

  • The size and scale of your team. Do you have a Chief Operating Officer or Legal Operations Manager in-house?
  • The length and stability of the relationship you have developed. For instance, have you worked with counsel for years and automated many aspects of the relationship, or are you still getting to know one another and trying to figure out how to work together?
  • The cycle and timing of the work. Are you engaged in long projects with relaxed timeframes or small projects with tight deadlines?
  • Whether you’ve encountered challenges with counsel before.
  • Whether you’re working with (or testing out) multiple attorney teams to determine the best fit.
  • Whether regulatory or compliance requirements necessitate certain types of reporting.
  • The degree to which you’ve solidified your business model. How well do you know what you need from outside counsel? Do you have a clear idea of the ideal relationship, or are you still evolving your business and developing your processes?
  • In general, the more problems you’ve had in the past (or you anticipate that you might have, based on experience), the shorter your review timeframes should be. Similarly, the less familiar you are with counsel and your processes and expectations, the more frequently you should conduct performance reviews.

TESTED TIPS FOR MAKING YOUR REVIEWS SUCCESSFUL (AND AS STRESS-FREE AS POSSIBLE, GIVEN THE STAKES):

1. Quantify the expectations of everyone involved. As we touched on before, the more precisely you can identify your KPIs, the easier it is to give feedback. It’s a lot easier to say, “you didn’t meet such and such a number in quarter three” than it is to say, “we are generally unhappy with how you have been communicating.”

2. Solicit internal and external feedback to determine how the performance evaluation process can improve. Don’t assume. Ask good questions. Ask the people inside the process to tell you what could be improved and what works well.

3. Document the performance review process. Even if you’ve worked with outside counsel for a dozen years, and your people know their people intimately, document everything. For instance, someone can quickly fill in if a critical stakeholder leaves. Documentation also lets you improve the process over time. Write down exactly what happens (your “As Is” map). Separately determine precisely how to conduct the review. Then build towards a better process.

4. Use powerful software to automate the review. Explore Onit’s European legal spend management solution BusyLamp eBilling.Space for insights. Our product can help you streamline your outside counsel performance review and strengthen and improve this crucial relationship.

How Performance Reviews Can Help the Outside Counsel Management Process

The process of formal performance reviews is not always the most eagerly anticipated part of the work year for most managers and employees. So why should outside counsel or general counsel and their in-house legal department look upon it more positively?

The answer is that, as with a successful performance review system at any progressive company, the process can help nurture and sustain a good, productive working relationship, which in the end, is what both parties desire. It gives general counsel a chance to discuss and confirm expectations; it can reveal possibilities for improving the efficiency or effectiveness of processes through reviewing reports and procedures; and it provides an opportunity for GCs to praise outstanding performance and bring up any areas for improvement.

Some law firms these days are proactively asking to be evaluated, believing that constructive criticism can be beneficial in the long run, and displaying a positive attitude about the process can only help their relationship.

One of the keys to a proper outside counsel review is to make law firms aware of client objectives/expectations and milestones and the metrics used.

OUTSIDE COUNSEL MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE AREAS

Some suggested areas of performance for review include:

  • Quality of work — How does it compare with work performed with similar matters, in similar situations, or by this firm in the past?
  • Expertise — Did outside counsel exhibit proper knowledge in such important areas as procedural law and substantive law, opposing counsel, judges, etc.?
  • Timing in delivery of work against expectations
  • Adhering to the budget and staffing plan — and if there were adjustments, were they discussed with plenty of advance notice?
  • Communication with in-house management, including responsiveness and availability
  • Outside counsel collaboration, as appropriate
  • Results

Some of these performance areas should be monitored during outside counsel engagement as progress unfolds, at regular intervals, or in real-time. This is often when feedback and conversation can make a real difference — and this is where versatile tracking, e-billing, and legal spend and matter management software can provide valuable capabilities for compiling data, issuing reports, and analyzing performance.

The in-house team should also remember that outside counsel management is a two-way street, and the best performance reviews will also consider their performance. For example:

How did the general counsel/legal operations team do in managing processes? How did they partner and collaborate to help deliver value? What part of their performance can be better next time?

Request a demo of BusyLamp eBilling.Space today.

Matter Management: Using BusyLamp to Monitor Outside Counsel

As much as they may not want to admit it, some general counsel find themselves thinking that, at times, monitoring and controlling outside counsel activity begins to resemble the proverbial task of herding cats. Fortunately, tracking and e-billing software today can help define, monitor, and control outside counsel spending to gather and guide these cats within the established parameters, with instant notification if one strays outside the lines.

Onit’s European legal spend management solution BusyLamp eBilling.Space offers a Legal Fee Tracker that allows you to establish budgets, staffing limits, and other expectations and then measure the billable activity against those pre-defined totals and milestones along the way. Having access to pre-billing time entries makes it easy to stay on top of how legal spend is progressing on each separate legal matter, recognize potential issues developing, and make corrections before they get worse. Moreover, the updates come in without either party having to chase after the other.

BusyLamp’s Legal e-Billing accelerates the process of receipt and review of billing through automation, efficiently mapping it against your customized guidelines, including fee arrangements, negotiated discounts, spending caps, timekeeper rates, etc. It can capture the detailed billing information submitted by each firm, seamlessly translate manual or LEDES formats into a single form, and then route it to any designated approver. By automatically noting any violations, the software dramatically reduces the chance of error while increasing the review speed, substantially decreasing the support staff time needed to go over invoices.

MATTER MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL

Non-compliance with guidelines isn’t necessarily a deliberate act by outside counsel. Many firms deal with so many clients and differing contracts that it is understandably difficult to completely comply with each guideline. It’s not unusual for law firms to comply with widely varying terms regarding staffing (allocations for different experience levels, diversity requirements, etc.), expenses (including travel and other allowable or unallowed items), and time limitations. Billing software leverages technology to signal when actions are out of compliance, providing a straightforward, non-confrontational method of resolving the matter.

In addition to helping to manage matters and keeping operations running smoothly, the enhanced transparency and detailed information gathering, and analytics also help to set the stage for open and honest communication and collaboration between general and outside counsel. The additional insight provided through analytics can also deliver deep insights into the nature of your legal expenditures, providing a foundation for evaluating options for using outside counsel going forward and such considerations as internal cost allocation.

Compliance and cost-containment are necessary concerns for general counsel. But with a well-considered process in place, supported by versatile software capabilities such as those available from BusyLamp, maintaining a compliant working relationship can become less stressful, more productive, and in the best case, just the expected course of business.

Request a demo of eBilling.Space today and see our RFP functionality for yourself.